Showing posts with label Public Comment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Public Comment. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
What I am Working On
Now, you tell me, does this place need defending? Shall we see this area damned? Will we stand idly by while this area is destroyed? This is my sanctuary, this is my church. This is more important than irrigation, this is more important than some damn project to store water. The desert has just enough water. Just too many people. And this, this is not really the desert. Only the foothills going into the desert. This place needs help!
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Wolf Meeting Thoughts
First off, if you ever have a chance to go to a wolf meeting, do so, just for the amazing uneducated dialogue that takes place. I could have watched FOX news and been more educated.
This meeting was simply on the proposed changes for the Wyoming Wolf Management plan, since it was shot down by Judge Molloy in Montana earlier this year. Basically there were four main issues in the judges ruling to overturn Wyoming's management plan. They included: Genetic Connectivity, Minimum Population Commitment, The Trophy Game Management Area, and Depredation Control. This new Emergency Plan is supposed to be a way to address these issues a little bit better, and wishfully thinking, allow Wyoming to regain control of it's gray wolf population.
Bill Rudd basically walked through the word changes, and described them as simply a firmer commitment to maintaining the number of packs, in case something catastrophic happens withing the Parks. They also threw in a new little blurb about the genetic connectivity issue:
To the extent practicable, the Commission is committed to managing the gray wolves in Wyoming so that genetic diversity and connectivity issues do not threaten the gray wolf population. This will be accomplished by encouraging the incorporation of effective migrants into the gray wolf population. Conservation measures will include, but are not limited to, working with other states to promote natural dispersal into and within the WTGMA (Wolf Trophy Game Management Area) and, if necessary, by relocation and translocation. You know, I passed many a college biology test by simply being able to bullshit through what I thought the professor wanted to hear. This is a fine example of that. There is no plan here, no groundbreaking revelations, just a desperate attempt to blow smoke up the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's collective skirt.
There is also some new wording on Lethal Take Permits. Chapter 21, Section 3(a) Chapter 21, Section 3(a) defines "chronic wolf depredation" as "a geographic area limited to a specific parcel of private land or a specific grazing allotment described on the permit within the Wolf Trophy Game Management Area where gray wolves have repeatedly (twice or more within a two month period immediately preceding the date on which the owner applies for a lethal take permit) harassed, injured, maimed or killed livestock or domesticated animals." Wolves taken under the authority of a lethal take permit shall be reported to the Department representative specified on the permit within 23 hours. Lethal take permits shall expire on December 31 of the year issued. However, lethal take permits shall be immediately suspended or cancelled if the Department determines further lethal control may result in the number of wolves in the WTGMA decreasing below 15 breeding pairs or 150 wolves, or below 7 breeding pairs outside the national parks and parkway. In addition, lethal take permits shall be immediately suspended or cancelled if the Department determines further lethal control may result in the re listing of gray wolves under the Endangered Species Act. In either of these circumstances, non-lethal control actions shall be initiated to mitigate continued harassment, injury, maiming or killing of livestock or domesticated animals. Whew! My fingers hurt after that, and what exactly does all that say? Basically if you are Joe Shmoe rancher, and you have evidence of wolves killing animals, you can apply for this permit that will allow you to shoot them on sight. After you kill your two wolves, you can reapply for another permit. Now, there is also a state law, pertaining to all predators, that allows for Joe Schmoe rancher to blast an animal in the act, or even thinking of the act "as a reasonable person would suspect" of hurting their livestock. Add on top of all that, the control measures that the Feds and State will be doing, and it is open season.
Predator status is still a go, one of the main hang ups with a lot of people, myself included. Outside of the WTGMA, people would still be allowed to blast any wolf they saw, for any reason, unless the number of packs falls below 15, where the Feds would step back in and take control. With the changes to the law, you would no longer be required to turn over a pelt and skull, only report your name and address, the date of the kill, the sex of the wolf, and a location. And, this makes me laugh quite hard. The Department may also seek the person's cooperation in obtaining any additional information relevant to wolf management, as warranted. If someone is out shooting wolves for pleasure, what do you think his response is going to be on management? This is not rocket science people!
A fairly large issue was brought up, concerning the word "predator". That, as already stated, is a major hang up with the judge in Montana. So why not remove that word? I have my own theories on that, but the way it has been pushed through is simple. The state has to have this plan into the USFWS by November 28th. The Wyoming Commission does not meet until November 17th and 18th, and the State Legislature does not meet until February 14th. The word predator is in law, and can only be repealed by Legislature. Now, a Representative from the Wyoming Government was there, and he said, something to the effect of "Well you people have already been liberal with your Plan under the law, why don't you just remove it and call it good." No one wants to remove that particular word, it is what has held Wyoming up this whole time. If that word were removed, this would go through.
So, what does this mean, long and short? It means victory for people who would like to keep wolf management in the hands of the Federal Government. Wyoming has had it's chance to change the laws, remove predator status, and be cooperative, and they have blown it. They have made their bed, now it is time for them to sleep in it. As for what it means for Wyoming? I doubt we will be re-gaining control in a timely manner. The wording in this emergency plan does not address the issues of litigation proposed by Molloy, and, in fact, adds to the issues in certain places.
Public comments are due in the office of the Wyoming Game and Fish by November 10th. Your comment must be in their hands on this date.
The address to write to is:
Wolf Plan Comments
Attn: Bea Pepper
Wyoming Game and Fish Department
5400 Bishop Blvd
Cheyenne, WY 82006
The next planned meeting in Cody is December 16th.
This meeting was simply on the proposed changes for the Wyoming Wolf Management plan, since it was shot down by Judge Molloy in Montana earlier this year. Basically there were four main issues in the judges ruling to overturn Wyoming's management plan. They included: Genetic Connectivity, Minimum Population Commitment, The Trophy Game Management Area, and Depredation Control. This new Emergency Plan is supposed to be a way to address these issues a little bit better, and wishfully thinking, allow Wyoming to regain control of it's gray wolf population.
Bill Rudd basically walked through the word changes, and described them as simply a firmer commitment to maintaining the number of packs, in case something catastrophic happens withing the Parks. They also threw in a new little blurb about the genetic connectivity issue:
To the extent practicable, the Commission is committed to managing the gray wolves in Wyoming so that genetic diversity and connectivity issues do not threaten the gray wolf population. This will be accomplished by encouraging the incorporation of effective migrants into the gray wolf population. Conservation measures will include, but are not limited to, working with other states to promote natural dispersal into and within the WTGMA (Wolf Trophy Game Management Area) and, if necessary, by relocation and translocation. You know, I passed many a college biology test by simply being able to bullshit through what I thought the professor wanted to hear. This is a fine example of that. There is no plan here, no groundbreaking revelations, just a desperate attempt to blow smoke up the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's collective skirt.
There is also some new wording on Lethal Take Permits. Chapter 21, Section 3(a) Chapter 21, Section 3(a) defines "chronic wolf depredation" as "a geographic area limited to a specific parcel of private land or a specific grazing allotment described on the permit within the Wolf Trophy Game Management Area where gray wolves have repeatedly (twice or more within a two month period immediately preceding the date on which the owner applies for a lethal take permit) harassed, injured, maimed or killed livestock or domesticated animals." Wolves taken under the authority of a lethal take permit shall be reported to the Department representative specified on the permit within 23 hours. Lethal take permits shall expire on December 31 of the year issued. However, lethal take permits shall be immediately suspended or cancelled if the Department determines further lethal control may result in the number of wolves in the WTGMA decreasing below 15 breeding pairs or 150 wolves, or below 7 breeding pairs outside the national parks and parkway. In addition, lethal take permits shall be immediately suspended or cancelled if the Department determines further lethal control may result in the re listing of gray wolves under the Endangered Species Act. In either of these circumstances, non-lethal control actions shall be initiated to mitigate continued harassment, injury, maiming or killing of livestock or domesticated animals. Whew! My fingers hurt after that, and what exactly does all that say? Basically if you are Joe Shmoe rancher, and you have evidence of wolves killing animals, you can apply for this permit that will allow you to shoot them on sight. After you kill your two wolves, you can reapply for another permit. Now, there is also a state law, pertaining to all predators, that allows for Joe Schmoe rancher to blast an animal in the act, or even thinking of the act "as a reasonable person would suspect" of hurting their livestock. Add on top of all that, the control measures that the Feds and State will be doing, and it is open season.
Predator status is still a go, one of the main hang ups with a lot of people, myself included. Outside of the WTGMA, people would still be allowed to blast any wolf they saw, for any reason, unless the number of packs falls below 15, where the Feds would step back in and take control. With the changes to the law, you would no longer be required to turn over a pelt and skull, only report your name and address, the date of the kill, the sex of the wolf, and a location. And, this makes me laugh quite hard. The Department may also seek the person's cooperation in obtaining any additional information relevant to wolf management, as warranted. If someone is out shooting wolves for pleasure, what do you think his response is going to be on management? This is not rocket science people!
A fairly large issue was brought up, concerning the word "predator". That, as already stated, is a major hang up with the judge in Montana. So why not remove that word? I have my own theories on that, but the way it has been pushed through is simple. The state has to have this plan into the USFWS by November 28th. The Wyoming Commission does not meet until November 17th and 18th, and the State Legislature does not meet until February 14th. The word predator is in law, and can only be repealed by Legislature. Now, a Representative from the Wyoming Government was there, and he said, something to the effect of "Well you people have already been liberal with your Plan under the law, why don't you just remove it and call it good." No one wants to remove that particular word, it is what has held Wyoming up this whole time. If that word were removed, this would go through.
So, what does this mean, long and short? It means victory for people who would like to keep wolf management in the hands of the Federal Government. Wyoming has had it's chance to change the laws, remove predator status, and be cooperative, and they have blown it. They have made their bed, now it is time for them to sleep in it. As for what it means for Wyoming? I doubt we will be re-gaining control in a timely manner. The wording in this emergency plan does not address the issues of litigation proposed by Molloy, and, in fact, adds to the issues in certain places.
Public comments are due in the office of the Wyoming Game and Fish by November 10th. Your comment must be in their hands on this date.
The address to write to is:
Wolf Plan Comments
Attn: Bea Pepper
Wyoming Game and Fish Department
5400 Bishop Blvd
Cheyenne, WY 82006
The next planned meeting in Cody is December 16th.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Wolf Comment Meeting Tomorrow!
If you don't show up and comment, you have absolutely no right to bitch. Here is OUR time to let all of our voices be heard.
The Game and Fish Department has released a draft revised version of the gray wolf management plan for public comment.The draft revised plan addresses many of the issues brought up in recent court decisions regarding removal of the Northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves from the federal Threatened and Endangered Species List.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has reopened the public comment period on its proposal to delist the wolves.
That public comment period ends Nov. 28.Wyoming's revised plan will be submitted to the USFWS during this comment period as part of Wyoming's comments on the federal delisting proposal.Revisions to Wyoming's wolf plan are consistent with emergency rule changes to G&F regulations.Those emergency rules were signed by Wyoming Game and Fish Commission president Jerry Galles and Gov. Dave Freudenthal Oct. 27 and are in effect for 120 days.G&F is initiating a formal rulemaking process to make those rules permanent.“First of all, these rules do not become effective unless and until the wolf is delisted in Wyoming,” Freudenthal said. “This is an attempt to operate within the current statute and to be responsive to the signals that we are receiving from USFWS and the judge in Montana.”G&F will hold two public meetings to discuss the revised plan and accept public comments.�Cody, 7 p.m. Nov. 5 at the Holiday Inn.�Lander, 7 p.m. Nov. 6 at the Lander Community Center.The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission will review public comments and take action on the revised plan at the commission's next meeting Nov. 17-18 in Jackson.Written public comments on the revised plan will be accepted at the Cody and Lander meetings, by mail or by fax and must be received by 5 p.m. Nov. 10.“We realize this is a tight time frame for public review,” said G&F director Steve Ferrell. “Our goal is to have a revised plan approved by the Game and Fish Commission at their next meeting. This will allow the USFWS to consider a revised Wyoming plan as they move forward with another delisting proposal.”Draft revisions to the plan include language to clarify Wyoming's commitment to maintain at least 15 breeding pairs of wolves and 150 individual wolves in the established Trophy Game Management Area. The draft also addresses actions the commission will take if numbers within Yellowstone and Grand Teton parks and the Rockefeller Parkway drop below eight breeding pairs.Other revisions in the draft include shortening some reporting requirements for those who kill wolves, either through licensed hunting or through livestock depredation actions, further defining “damage to private property” and “chronic wolf depredation,” further restricting the Game and Fish Commission's ability to change the boundaries of the Trophy Game Management Area and restricting lethal take permits to no more than two wolves.The Game and Fish Commission last revised its wolf management plan in November 2007. That plan was subsequently accepted by the USFWS.Wolves were removed from the federal Threatened and Endangered Species List in March 2008, and were subsequently relisted in September 2008, after a federal judge in Montana granted a preliminary injunction against the delisting decision and the USFWS requested a remand of their delisting rule.“We see revising Wyoming's plan to address the judge's concerns as a necessary step toward getting wolves permanently delisted,” Ferrell said. “It's clear that wolves are recovered in the Northern Rocky Mountains and doing well. We have more than five times the number of wolves called for in the original delisting proposal. It's time for them to be delisted and for the states to assume management.”
The Game and Fish Department has released a draft revised version of the gray wolf management plan for public comment.The draft revised plan addresses many of the issues brought up in recent court decisions regarding removal of the Northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves from the federal Threatened and Endangered Species List.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has reopened the public comment period on its proposal to delist the wolves.
That public comment period ends Nov. 28.Wyoming's revised plan will be submitted to the USFWS during this comment period as part of Wyoming's comments on the federal delisting proposal.Revisions to Wyoming's wolf plan are consistent with emergency rule changes to G&F regulations.Those emergency rules were signed by Wyoming Game and Fish Commission president Jerry Galles and Gov. Dave Freudenthal Oct. 27 and are in effect for 120 days.G&F is initiating a formal rulemaking process to make those rules permanent.“First of all, these rules do not become effective unless and until the wolf is delisted in Wyoming,” Freudenthal said. “This is an attempt to operate within the current statute and to be responsive to the signals that we are receiving from USFWS and the judge in Montana.”G&F will hold two public meetings to discuss the revised plan and accept public comments.�Cody, 7 p.m. Nov. 5 at the Holiday Inn.�Lander, 7 p.m. Nov. 6 at the Lander Community Center.The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission will review public comments and take action on the revised plan at the commission's next meeting Nov. 17-18 in Jackson.Written public comments on the revised plan will be accepted at the Cody and Lander meetings, by mail or by fax and must be received by 5 p.m. Nov. 10.“We realize this is a tight time frame for public review,” said G&F director Steve Ferrell. “Our goal is to have a revised plan approved by the Game and Fish Commission at their next meeting. This will allow the USFWS to consider a revised Wyoming plan as they move forward with another delisting proposal.”Draft revisions to the plan include language to clarify Wyoming's commitment to maintain at least 15 breeding pairs of wolves and 150 individual wolves in the established Trophy Game Management Area. The draft also addresses actions the commission will take if numbers within Yellowstone and Grand Teton parks and the Rockefeller Parkway drop below eight breeding pairs.Other revisions in the draft include shortening some reporting requirements for those who kill wolves, either through licensed hunting or through livestock depredation actions, further defining “damage to private property” and “chronic wolf depredation,” further restricting the Game and Fish Commission's ability to change the boundaries of the Trophy Game Management Area and restricting lethal take permits to no more than two wolves.The Game and Fish Commission last revised its wolf management plan in November 2007. That plan was subsequently accepted by the USFWS.Wolves were removed from the federal Threatened and Endangered Species List in March 2008, and were subsequently relisted in September 2008, after a federal judge in Montana granted a preliminary injunction against the delisting decision and the USFWS requested a remand of their delisting rule.“We see revising Wyoming's plan to address the judge's concerns as a necessary step toward getting wolves permanently delisted,” Ferrell said. “It's clear that wolves are recovered in the Northern Rocky Mountains and doing well. We have more than five times the number of wolves called for in the original delisting proposal. It's time for them to be delisted and for the states to assume management.”
Yellowstone Winter Use Plan
A new winter use plan for Yellowstone and Grand Teton parks would provide for limited, guided snowmobile and snowcoach travel, including over Sylvan Pass, this winter.The two parks are seeking public comment through Nov. 17 on the proposal, which was released Monday and replaces a previous plan that was rejected by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., in September.The 2008-09 winter season is scheduled to open Dec. 15.
“Neither snowmobiles nor snowcoaches can be allowed in the parks this winter without (adopting) a new plan and new regulation,” Yellowstone spokesman Al Nash said Monday.The preferred alternative would allow up to 318 commercially guided, Best Available Technology (BAT) snowmobiles, and up to 78 snowcoaches per day in Yellowstone.The preferred alternative would also provide for motorized oversnow travel over Sylvan Pass and Yellowstone's East Entrance road, as agreed to this summer by the Sylvan Pass Study Group.Daily snowmobile limits in the new plan are slightly above last winter's average of 294 snowmobiles per day, but well below the 720 per day allowed the past four winters, and lower than the 540 snowmobiles a day that would have been allowed this winter under the plan rejected by the judge.The daily snowcoach limit is the same as allowed during the past four years.“I'm happy the Park Service and Department of the Interior are taking action to keep the park open for this coming winter season,” state Rep. Colin Simpson of Cody said Monday. He serves on the study group that worked to keep the east gate open in winter. The initial NPS decision was to close it for safety and financial reasons.“Regardless of the numbers they're using, something needs to be done to keep (the parks) open,” Simpson added. “They have used a number that was upheld in the 2004 EA, and I'm sure since it's survived judicial scrutiny once, it could do so again.”He added that he is pleased the agencies “are honoring the agreement on Sylvan Pass, which is the right thing to do.”In Grand Teton and the Rockefeller Parkway, grooming and motorized oversnow travel on the Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail between Moran Junction and Flagg Ranch would be discontinued.However, those interested in through travel on the CDST could transport their snowmobiles on trailers between these locations, Nash said.A total of 25 snowmobiles per day would be allowed to travel on the Grassy Lake Road, with no BAT or guiding requirement.In addition, 25 unguided BAT snowmobiles per day also would be allowed on Jackson Lake for ice fishing.The plan would be in effect for up to three winters in Yellowstone.“Park managers believe an approach including both snowmobile and snowcoach access reduces impacts of both to acceptable levels,” Nash said. “This environmental assessment addresses the impact concerns raised by the recent ruling of the U.S. District Court.”The Winter Use Plan's Environmental Assessment (EA) and an electronic form to submit comments can be found at http://parkplanning.nps.gov.Written comments, due by Nov. 17, may be submitted through this Web site.Nash said a proposed rule to implement the preferred alternative in the new plan will be published within a few days in the Federal Register, and also will be open for a 15-day public comment period.Once comments are analyzed, the Park Service will make a decision on the proposed plan, Nash said.If the preferred alternative is selected, the Regional Director of the Intermountain Region of the Park Service will sign a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) containing details of his decision.A final rule would have to be published in the Federal Register to implement the FONSI and provide for motorized oversnow travel in the parks this winter.The Park Service expects to have a decision on winter use prior by the Dec. 15 start of the winter season.Document requests also may be made by sending an e-mail to yell_winter_use@nps.gov or calling (307) 344-2019.(Carole Cloudwalker can be reached at carole@codyenterprise.com.)
“Neither snowmobiles nor snowcoaches can be allowed in the parks this winter without (adopting) a new plan and new regulation,” Yellowstone spokesman Al Nash said Monday.The preferred alternative would allow up to 318 commercially guided, Best Available Technology (BAT) snowmobiles, and up to 78 snowcoaches per day in Yellowstone.The preferred alternative would also provide for motorized oversnow travel over Sylvan Pass and Yellowstone's East Entrance road, as agreed to this summer by the Sylvan Pass Study Group.Daily snowmobile limits in the new plan are slightly above last winter's average of 294 snowmobiles per day, but well below the 720 per day allowed the past four winters, and lower than the 540 snowmobiles a day that would have been allowed this winter under the plan rejected by the judge.The daily snowcoach limit is the same as allowed during the past four years.“I'm happy the Park Service and Department of the Interior are taking action to keep the park open for this coming winter season,” state Rep. Colin Simpson of Cody said Monday. He serves on the study group that worked to keep the east gate open in winter. The initial NPS decision was to close it for safety and financial reasons.“Regardless of the numbers they're using, something needs to be done to keep (the parks) open,” Simpson added. “They have used a number that was upheld in the 2004 EA, and I'm sure since it's survived judicial scrutiny once, it could do so again.”He added that he is pleased the agencies “are honoring the agreement on Sylvan Pass, which is the right thing to do.”In Grand Teton and the Rockefeller Parkway, grooming and motorized oversnow travel on the Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail between Moran Junction and Flagg Ranch would be discontinued.However, those interested in through travel on the CDST could transport their snowmobiles on trailers between these locations, Nash said.A total of 25 snowmobiles per day would be allowed to travel on the Grassy Lake Road, with no BAT or guiding requirement.In addition, 25 unguided BAT snowmobiles per day also would be allowed on Jackson Lake for ice fishing.The plan would be in effect for up to three winters in Yellowstone.“Park managers believe an approach including both snowmobile and snowcoach access reduces impacts of both to acceptable levels,” Nash said. “This environmental assessment addresses the impact concerns raised by the recent ruling of the U.S. District Court.”The Winter Use Plan's Environmental Assessment (EA) and an electronic form to submit comments can be found at http://parkplanning.nps.gov.Written comments, due by Nov. 17, may be submitted through this Web site.Nash said a proposed rule to implement the preferred alternative in the new plan will be published within a few days in the Federal Register, and also will be open for a 15-day public comment period.Once comments are analyzed, the Park Service will make a decision on the proposed plan, Nash said.If the preferred alternative is selected, the Regional Director of the Intermountain Region of the Park Service will sign a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) containing details of his decision.A final rule would have to be published in the Federal Register to implement the FONSI and provide for motorized oversnow travel in the parks this winter.The Park Service expects to have a decision on winter use prior by the Dec. 15 start of the winter season.Document requests also may be made by sending an e-mail to yell_winter_use@nps.gov or calling (307) 344-2019.(Carole Cloudwalker can be reached at carole@codyenterprise.com.)
Monday, November 3, 2008
Yet some more petroleum producer news
Care of the Casper Star Tribune
By JEFF GEARINO
Southwest Wyoming bureau
Monday, November 3, 2008 2:05 AM MST
ROCK SPRINGS -- Another fight over oil and gas leasing on Little Mountain and in the Red Desert's Jack Morrow Hills area is brewing in southwest Wyoming.
Hunting and fishing conservationists said this week the groups will submit formal protests for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's planned Dec. 2 competitive oil and gas lease sale.
The areas up for lease include some parcels on Little Mountain in southern Sweetwater County and in the Jack Morrow Hills in northern part of the county.
Conservationists said the auction of oil and gas leases will threaten the two areas, which are rich in wildlife, including prime sage grouse habitat, cultural and recreational resources.
Officials with the Biodiversity Conservation Alliance and the Wyoming Wildlife Federation said the leasing of several parcels within the two areas should be put on hold.
"We think this 11th-hour fire sale of our public lands should be put on hold, because the industry already has many times more lease acreage than it can possible drill," said Biodiversity wildlife biologist Erik Molvar.
Several conservation groups formally protested an earlier BLM lease sale Aug. 5, which included some parcels on Little Mountain. But the protests were denied, the sale proceeded and the parcels were leased.
For more than a decade, the Jack Morrow Hills north of Rock Springs have been a key battleground in the oil and gas industry boom enveloping southwest Wyoming -- primarily in the Pinedale Anticline and Jonah oil and gas fields in northern Sweetwater and Sublette counties.
Little Mountain was thrust into the energy fray in December when the Oklahoma-based Devon Energy Co. announced plans to conduct a two-well exploratory drilling project near the mountain.
A popular county recreation area, Little Mountain lies about 40 miles south of Rock Springs, near the Flaming Gorge Reservoir.
The mountain is home to several premier hunting areas for elk and deer, as well as sage grouse, Colorado River cutthroat trout and other wildlife.
A loose coalition of conservationists, faith-based organizations, blue-collar workers and hunters panned the project at the time amidst fears the small wildcat project could lead to full-scale development on the mountain.
Gov. Dave Freudenthal also decried the drilling project and a follow-up proposal by Devon to conduct three-dimensional seismic surveys as part of the project.
Devon officials said during a recent tour of the company's two exploratory well sites that geology and technology will go a long way toward reducing the company's footprint on the mountain.
Company officials said with proper planning and the necessary resources, drilling can be conducted in an environmentally sensitive manner and without significant harm to wildlife.
They noted the area's geology would make any commercial development by Devon a "unique play" that would not require nearly as many wells and well pads as the more intense development to the north in the Jonah Field.
Jack Morrow Hills
The 620,000-acre Jack Morrow Hills have been at the center of the national energy debate in western Wyoming for more than a decade. The area contains stark, unique scenery and spectacular formations such as the Boar's Tusk, Steamboat Mountain, the Killpecker Sand Dunes and the Honeycombs.
The area also has vast resources of natural gas, oil and coal. The hills contain an estimated 315 billion cubic feet of natural gas.
Bruce Pendery, Public Lands Director for the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said in a release it's been more than 10 years since a lease was sold in the Jack Morrow Hills area. He noted during that time, oil and gas development in Wyoming hasn't slowed.
"The Jack Morrow Hills and Little Mountain are too valuable for their wildlife, historical and recreation resources to be opened to development now, when the evidence shows we can have oil and gas without sacrificing areas like these," Pendery said.
He said the two leases in the hills include some prime sage grouse habitat sites that are included in the governor's recently adopted sage grouse conservation strategy.
The deadline for protests is 4 p.m., Nov. 17, according to the BLM's lease sale notice. Once the protests are received, the agency will make a decision to either withdraw the parcels or to proceed with offering the parcels at the sale.
Contact southwest Wyoming bureau reporter Jeff Gearino at (307) 875-5359 or gearino@tribcsp.com
By JEFF GEARINO
Southwest Wyoming bureau
Monday, November 3, 2008 2:05 AM MST
ROCK SPRINGS -- Another fight over oil and gas leasing on Little Mountain and in the Red Desert's Jack Morrow Hills area is brewing in southwest Wyoming.
Hunting and fishing conservationists said this week the groups will submit formal protests for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's planned Dec. 2 competitive oil and gas lease sale.
The areas up for lease include some parcels on Little Mountain in southern Sweetwater County and in the Jack Morrow Hills in northern part of the county.
Conservationists said the auction of oil and gas leases will threaten the two areas, which are rich in wildlife, including prime sage grouse habitat, cultural and recreational resources.
Officials with the Biodiversity Conservation Alliance and the Wyoming Wildlife Federation said the leasing of several parcels within the two areas should be put on hold.
"We think this 11th-hour fire sale of our public lands should be put on hold, because the industry already has many times more lease acreage than it can possible drill," said Biodiversity wildlife biologist Erik Molvar.
Several conservation groups formally protested an earlier BLM lease sale Aug. 5, which included some parcels on Little Mountain. But the protests were denied, the sale proceeded and the parcels were leased.
For more than a decade, the Jack Morrow Hills north of Rock Springs have been a key battleground in the oil and gas industry boom enveloping southwest Wyoming -- primarily in the Pinedale Anticline and Jonah oil and gas fields in northern Sweetwater and Sublette counties.
Little Mountain was thrust into the energy fray in December when the Oklahoma-based Devon Energy Co. announced plans to conduct a two-well exploratory drilling project near the mountain.
A popular county recreation area, Little Mountain lies about 40 miles south of Rock Springs, near the Flaming Gorge Reservoir.
The mountain is home to several premier hunting areas for elk and deer, as well as sage grouse, Colorado River cutthroat trout and other wildlife.
A loose coalition of conservationists, faith-based organizations, blue-collar workers and hunters panned the project at the time amidst fears the small wildcat project could lead to full-scale development on the mountain.
Gov. Dave Freudenthal also decried the drilling project and a follow-up proposal by Devon to conduct three-dimensional seismic surveys as part of the project.
Devon officials said during a recent tour of the company's two exploratory well sites that geology and technology will go a long way toward reducing the company's footprint on the mountain.
Company officials said with proper planning and the necessary resources, drilling can be conducted in an environmentally sensitive manner and without significant harm to wildlife.
They noted the area's geology would make any commercial development by Devon a "unique play" that would not require nearly as many wells and well pads as the more intense development to the north in the Jonah Field.
Jack Morrow Hills
The 620,000-acre Jack Morrow Hills have been at the center of the national energy debate in western Wyoming for more than a decade. The area contains stark, unique scenery and spectacular formations such as the Boar's Tusk, Steamboat Mountain, the Killpecker Sand Dunes and the Honeycombs.
The area also has vast resources of natural gas, oil and coal. The hills contain an estimated 315 billion cubic feet of natural gas.
Bruce Pendery, Public Lands Director for the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said in a release it's been more than 10 years since a lease was sold in the Jack Morrow Hills area. He noted during that time, oil and gas development in Wyoming hasn't slowed.
"The Jack Morrow Hills and Little Mountain are too valuable for their wildlife, historical and recreation resources to be opened to development now, when the evidence shows we can have oil and gas without sacrificing areas like these," Pendery said.
He said the two leases in the hills include some prime sage grouse habitat sites that are included in the governor's recently adopted sage grouse conservation strategy.
The deadline for protests is 4 p.m., Nov. 17, according to the BLM's lease sale notice. Once the protests are received, the agency will make a decision to either withdraw the parcels or to proceed with offering the parcels at the sale.
Contact southwest Wyoming bureau reporter Jeff Gearino at (307) 875-5359 or gearino@tribcsp.com
Friday, October 31, 2008
Defenders of Wildlife Wolf Update
It’s an awful Halloween surprise.
Earlier this week, the Bush/Cheney Administration launched another attack on wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies -- re-packaging a proposal that could lead to the killing of as many as 1,000 of America’s most important and iconic animals.
Take action now. Tell the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that our wolves deserve a lasting future in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies.
Following several bloody months of wolf killing in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, a federal court ruled earlier this year against an earlier version of the Administration’s proposal to remove Endangered Species Act protections for the region’s wolves. In response, the Bush/Cheney Administration actually withdrew that proposal just a few weeks ago.
But with the clock winding down on the Bush/Administration, federal officials are launching a last-ditch attempt to re-package and ram through a plan that could lead to the slaughter of as many as two-thirds of the Greater Yellowstone and Northern Rockies wolf population.
Don’t let them get away with it. Urge federal officials to come up with a responsible management plan that ensures a lasting future for these majestic animals.
Time and time again, Defenders of Wildlife has been at the forefront of efforts to save wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies, fighting -- and winning -- in court, on the ground and in Congress to ensure responsible, balanced management of our wolves.
In the last two years, caring people like you have sent tens of thousands of messages, made thousands of calls, and donated to help us fight the Bush/Cheney Administration and their allies in court, educate the public and support wolf-saving efforts in the field.
Help us safeguard wolves. Take action now.
Unfortunately, we don’t have much time to stop this audacious 11th-hour sneak attack on our wolves. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is only accepting public comments until November 28th, so please take action now.
For the Wild Ones,
Rodger Schlickeisen, President Signature
Rodger Schlickeisen
President
Defenders of Wildlife
Rodger Schlickeisen, President (c)Daniel J. Cox/www.naturalexpos
P.S. Over the next month, we need to generate thousands of public comments on this outrageous plan. We need to mobilize conservation activists to show up at public meetings and speak out. And we have to prepare for what could be another long, difficult legal fight ahead.
Earlier this week, the Bush/Cheney Administration launched another attack on wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies -- re-packaging a proposal that could lead to the killing of as many as 1,000 of America’s most important and iconic animals.
Take action now. Tell the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that our wolves deserve a lasting future in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies.
Following several bloody months of wolf killing in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, a federal court ruled earlier this year against an earlier version of the Administration’s proposal to remove Endangered Species Act protections for the region’s wolves. In response, the Bush/Cheney Administration actually withdrew that proposal just a few weeks ago.
But with the clock winding down on the Bush/Administration, federal officials are launching a last-ditch attempt to re-package and ram through a plan that could lead to the slaughter of as many as two-thirds of the Greater Yellowstone and Northern Rockies wolf population.
Don’t let them get away with it. Urge federal officials to come up with a responsible management plan that ensures a lasting future for these majestic animals.
Time and time again, Defenders of Wildlife has been at the forefront of efforts to save wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies, fighting -- and winning -- in court, on the ground and in Congress to ensure responsible, balanced management of our wolves.
In the last two years, caring people like you have sent tens of thousands of messages, made thousands of calls, and donated to help us fight the Bush/Cheney Administration and their allies in court, educate the public and support wolf-saving efforts in the field.
Help us safeguard wolves. Take action now.
Unfortunately, we don’t have much time to stop this audacious 11th-hour sneak attack on our wolves. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is only accepting public comments until November 28th, so please take action now.
For the Wild Ones,
Rodger Schlickeisen, President Signature
Rodger Schlickeisen
President
Defenders of Wildlife
Rodger Schlickeisen, President (c)Daniel J. Cox/www.naturalexpos
P.S. Over the next month, we need to generate thousands of public comments on this outrageous plan. We need to mobilize conservation activists to show up at public meetings and speak out. And we have to prepare for what could be another long, difficult legal fight ahead.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Green River... Older News Post, But Good Info
From Jackson Hole News:
Board mulls hearing on Upper Green dam
Water commission not convinced reservoir idea would fly, but may consider public views
Noah Brenner
December 26, 2007
The Wyoming Water Development Commission will meet Jan. 8 in Casper
to consider whether to hold a public hearing on a plan to build a dam
across the Upper Green River.
The idea of damming the Green River between Warren Bridge, where it
crosses Highway 191, and Green River lakes on the edge of the Bridger
Wilderness has been studied over the last 50 years.
The dam would be in Sublette County about 60 miles south of Jackson.
In September, the commission released a study that found a mainstem
dam on the Upper Green River would be prohibitively expensive, would
hurt instream flow and wetlands and would likely never receive a
federal construction permit.
That report was presented to the Wyoming Legislature's Select Water
Committee at a workshop meeting in August, and now the Water
Development Commission will decide whether to present the study to
the public at a formal meeting.
Wyoming Water Development Commission Director Mike Purcell said the
possibility of a public meeting does not mean the state is
considering moving ahead with a dam project.
"It is very premature to assume one darn thing is going to happen,"
Purcell said.
With the conclusions drawn in the state report, the idea would seem
to be dead, but Purcell said Dan Budd, a water development
commissioner who represents Sublette County, continues to push the
idea.
"I suggested that before we invest one more dime we ought to see what
the public thinks about it," Purcell said.
In theory, it only takes one "fatal flaw" to kill a reclamation
project. The two reservoir sites considered in the report have
numerous fatal flaws, according to analysis by water development
commission staff.
Condensed to 18 pages, the report details the costs and benefits of
two sites, the Upper and Lower Kendall Reservoir sites between
Kendall Bridge and Warren Bridge on the Green. Both dams would
require miles of canals and tunnels to bring the water to ranchers.
"It is doubtful, however, that the number of benefits or
beneficiaries would be sufficient to justify the expense for
constructing the project," the report states.
Besides the imbalance in the cost-benefit analysis, the report notes
that the state holds an instream flow permit on almost 10 miles of
the river to protect the fishery, most of which would be inundated by
the dam.
Since the middle of last century, the state of Wyoming has been
studying the feasibility of constructing a dam to impound the Green
River somewhere between Warren Bridge and Kendall Bridge or even
higher upstream at Green River Lakes. Repeatedly analysts and
consultants have told the state that the project is not permit-able
because there are no justifiable water shortages in the immediate
area and it could be environmentally damaging.
The area is prized for its recreation, wildlife and scenery, and is
popular with Teton County residents and anglers who find the river
less crowded than some public lands in Jackson Hole.
Wyoming has rights to water in the Green River but has not exercised
those rights fully. Some officials are wary of allowing the water to
flow out of state unused, even though the Colorado River Compact
protects Wyoming's ownership.
The reach of the river in question is eligible for protection under
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Pinedale Field Office of the
federal Bureau of Land Management and Bridger-Teton National Forest
have managed it for wild and scenic values. But the Pinedale Resource
Management Plan, which governs land use throughout the Pinedale Field
Office, is being revised.
The Upper Green River Joint Powers Board, with the help of the water
development commission continues to look at dam sites along the
Wyoming Range front that are "off-channel," meaning they would not
impound streams that flow year-round or on smaller tributaries.
The commission meets at 1:30 p.m. on Jan. 8 at the Wyoming Game and
Fish offices in Casper. The building is at 3030 Energy Lane, and the
meeting will be in Suite 100.
Board mulls hearing on Upper Green dam
Water commission not convinced reservoir idea would fly, but may consider public views
Noah Brenner
December 26, 2007
The Wyoming Water Development Commission will meet Jan. 8 in Casper
to consider whether to hold a public hearing on a plan to build a dam
across the Upper Green River.
The idea of damming the Green River between Warren Bridge, where it
crosses Highway 191, and Green River lakes on the edge of the Bridger
Wilderness has been studied over the last 50 years.
The dam would be in Sublette County about 60 miles south of Jackson.
In September, the commission released a study that found a mainstem
dam on the Upper Green River would be prohibitively expensive, would
hurt instream flow and wetlands and would likely never receive a
federal construction permit.
That report was presented to the Wyoming Legislature's Select Water
Committee at a workshop meeting in August, and now the Water
Development Commission will decide whether to present the study to
the public at a formal meeting.
Wyoming Water Development Commission Director Mike Purcell said the
possibility of a public meeting does not mean the state is
considering moving ahead with a dam project.
"It is very premature to assume one darn thing is going to happen,"
Purcell said.
With the conclusions drawn in the state report, the idea would seem
to be dead, but Purcell said Dan Budd, a water development
commissioner who represents Sublette County, continues to push the
idea.
"I suggested that before we invest one more dime we ought to see what
the public thinks about it," Purcell said.
In theory, it only takes one "fatal flaw" to kill a reclamation
project. The two reservoir sites considered in the report have
numerous fatal flaws, according to analysis by water development
commission staff.
Condensed to 18 pages, the report details the costs and benefits of
two sites, the Upper and Lower Kendall Reservoir sites between
Kendall Bridge and Warren Bridge on the Green. Both dams would
require miles of canals and tunnels to bring the water to ranchers.
"It is doubtful, however, that the number of benefits or
beneficiaries would be sufficient to justify the expense for
constructing the project," the report states.
Besides the imbalance in the cost-benefit analysis, the report notes
that the state holds an instream flow permit on almost 10 miles of
the river to protect the fishery, most of which would be inundated by
the dam.
Since the middle of last century, the state of Wyoming has been
studying the feasibility of constructing a dam to impound the Green
River somewhere between Warren Bridge and Kendall Bridge or even
higher upstream at Green River Lakes. Repeatedly analysts and
consultants have told the state that the project is not permit-able
because there are no justifiable water shortages in the immediate
area and it could be environmentally damaging.
The area is prized for its recreation, wildlife and scenery, and is
popular with Teton County residents and anglers who find the river
less crowded than some public lands in Jackson Hole.
Wyoming has rights to water in the Green River but has not exercised
those rights fully. Some officials are wary of allowing the water to
flow out of state unused, even though the Colorado River Compact
protects Wyoming's ownership.
The reach of the river in question is eligible for protection under
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Pinedale Field Office of the
federal Bureau of Land Management and Bridger-Teton National Forest
have managed it for wild and scenic values. But the Pinedale Resource
Management Plan, which governs land use throughout the Pinedale Field
Office, is being revised.
The Upper Green River Joint Powers Board, with the help of the water
development commission continues to look at dam sites along the
Wyoming Range front that are "off-channel," meaning they would not
impound streams that flow year-round or on smaller tributaries.
The commission meets at 1:30 p.m. on Jan. 8 at the Wyoming Game and
Fish offices in Casper. The building is at 3030 Energy Lane, and the
meeting will be in Suite 100.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Fresh From the Casper Star Tribune.. This topic will continue to come up.
CHEYENNE -- In a move that sparked sharp criticism from environmental groups, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Friday announced that it once again is proposing a plan that could end federal protections for gray wolves in Montana and Idaho while leaving them in place in Wyoming.
The federal agency's push comes after U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy of Montana last week signed an order reinstating federal protections for the wolves in all three states. Ruling in a lawsuit brought by a coalition of environmental groups, the judge this summer barred the Fish and Wildlife Service from turning wolf management over to the states.
Molloy ruled that Wyoming's management plan in particular wouldn't give wolves adequate protection. Wyoming has proposed that wolves be classified as predators that could be shot on sight in much of the state.
Friday's announcement by the Fish and Wildlife Service says the agency will take public comments until Nov. 28 on the same proposed wolf delisting rule the agency released early last year. The agency says there are now more than 1,400 wolves in the three states.
Bruce Salzburg, Wyoming attorney general, said Friday the FWS's proposed 2007 rule would allow removing federal protections for wolves only in Montana and Idaho. The rule would also allow lifting federal protections for wolves in Wyoming, but only if the federal agency ruled that Wyoming's management plan was adequate.
The FWS found Wyoming's management plan acceptable before the environmental groups mounted their legal challenge. But the agency won't comment now on whether it still believes Wyoming's plan is acceptable now that Molloy has ruled it is not.
Salzburg said he sees little doubt the federal agency is ready to leave Wyoming behind.
"I expect they will look to the judge's decision and determine that Wyoming's regulatory mechanisms are inadequate, and go forward with an attempt to delist in the other two states," Salzburg said.
Salzburg said Wyoming ultimately intends to address Molloy's concerns by modifying the state's wolf management plan and regulations. However, the Wyoming Legislature doesn't convene until January, so there's no way the state could adopt new regulations that the federal agency might find acceptable and have them considered in the federal government's current delisting proposal.
Jamie Rappaport Clark is executive vice president of Defenders of Wildlife, one of the groups that sued over the wolf delisting. She's also a former director of the Fish and Wildlife Service under President Clinton. She said Friday her group is concerned about the agency's current approach.
"It's a hasty action that undermines the serious work and cooperation among all the stakeholders that's necessary before proposing any new rule," Clark said. "They just took the rule back. They're in essence rushing to ram this flawed rule through the current administration. And it's not giving the Fish and Wildlife Service time to address the serious concerns expressed earlier this year by the federal court in Missoula."
Salzburg, asked if it appears to him that the Fish and Wildlife Service is trying to resolve the issue before the end of the Bush administration, responded that he had no idea what's on the minds of agency officials.
Ed Bangs, wolf recovery coordinator for the Fish and Wildlife Service in Montana, said Friday that there are people in his agency who would like to see the wolf delisting process wrapped up by the end of the Bush administration. He said it's possible the agency will make a decision before then, but denied that desire is driving the agency to act quickly on the delisting process.
"This timing is set by the litigation and all that kind of stuff," Bangs said. "A lot of people are going to try to use this as a political deal."
Bangs said his agency hasn't decided whether Wyoming's management plan is inadequate, or if the state should be left behind in this round of the wolf delisting process.
"We're not putting any time line on it," he said. "The only thing I'm putting on it is we're going to take whatever time we need to do a good job and just use the best science."
Jenny Harbine is an attorney for Earthjustice, the law firm that represented the environmental coalition in challenging the delisting process.
"This is disappointing to say the least," Harbine said Friday. "We are very close to achieving a sustainable wolf population in the Northern Rockies. And we hope that the potential for a recovery success is not short-circuited by a premature delisting proposal."
Harbine said she has concerns about the legality and biological sufficiency of any plan that calls for delisting wolves in Montana and Idaho while leaving them under federal protection in Wyoming.
"The service has to treat this population as what it is, which is a single population of wolves," Harbine said. "Each recovery area is dependent on the others to maintain biological health. The legal reason is simply that the service is not permitted to treat portions of a population in isolation for the purpose of delisting. It cannot take a piecemeal approach to delisting."
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Drill, drill, DRILL!!!
Clark, Wyoming. Not too many people know of it, but could it have the potential to become the next Pinedale. If Windsor Energy Corporation has it's way, yes. From Missoula, Montana, Windsor is wanting to drill a new gas well near Clark, inside the National Forest boundary, on Line Creek. Line Creek, ok, that rings a bell. Yes, Line Creek, where, not too many years ago, another gas well leaked untold amounts of waste into the soil, causing damage that can only be speculated upon. October 14ththis story broke out, and thankfully, Greater Yellowstone Coalition (GYC) and Powder River Basin Resource Council (PRBRC) jumped upon it. These two groups are willing to prepare comments on behalf of the community, but in a great act of limiting the voice of dissent, the commissioners decided that consultants will gather public input. Horse hockey! By using consultants, they will get the comments of the developers. With zombie-like fervor, they will chant, "Drill, Drill, DRILL!!!" The Clarks Fork District of the Shoshone Forest wants public comment. Do it! This is the only way to get our voices heard! Those who do nothing, have no right to bitch later on. Write the district, the head office, Senators, Congressmen, and the GYC and PRBRC. Let them know what is on our minds. Drilling is a battle cry. It is the new ship, buccaneers, the developers. Loot! Cash! Development. This firm is from Missoula. Most high level jobs will go to Montanans. Look at the jobs locals will get, or any other benefits. Most riggers are from Back East. Few locals will get a piece of their pie. Let's look at the aesthetic value as well, one that the developers have a hard time with. There is no monetary figure for it. I really enjoy the fact that I can drive into Clark, and be alone. Throw on hiking boots, take off, and I am alone. That is worth preserving in a day when more and more of us work tedious jobs, and value down time in wild places. Development will ruin that. I already know the argument. There will be only one well! Yes, but because of a thing called presidence with one well, it will be easier for more to come in. You are anti-progress! This is not progress, this is the exact opposite. We value Wyoming, and especially Cody, for aesthetic reasons. Looking north to the Beartooths from Cody, I can see blue sky. Keep it that way. Imagine what 200 trucks, rigs, and all the associated traffic would do. Now, ask yourself, could I live with myself if I did nothing? I know my answer. Do you know yours?
For more information about this project, contact Marty Sharp of the Forest Circus, at (307) 527-6921
For more information about this project, contact Marty Sharp of the Forest Circus, at (307) 527-6921
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
